Wednesday, 6 January 2010

With friends like these




Banished for their unspeakable crimes against the universe, the Lords escape with the intention of destroying it for their own ends, aided by selfish humans and renegade time lords, but are thwarted by a plucky Scot whose only concern is for humanity. But that's enough laboured metaphors drawing on the last David Tennant Doctor Who episode.



I've a proud record of never supporting Labour's leaders. I didn't want Brown to become Prime Minister (a McDonnell/Skinner ticket would be my dream team). I hated Blair before he was even party leader. I thought John Smith and Kinnock were rightwing sellouts.

But. For all their incompetent and right-leaning faults, the current Labour leadership is better by far than the Tory government which I think is going to win the election in May or June. Come the Conservapocalypse, you'll realise that Cameron and his well-fed, privileged Friedmanites (the origin of 'greed is good') mean what they've been saying in recent months. They genuinely believe in 'small government', a term they picked up from the Reaganite (brilliantly cheesy site: needs sound) Republicans.

Like Reagan, they mean big government for bailing out their friends in the banking sector, and big government for the armed service and the weapons industry (proof on its own that socialist economics works), and small government for you: worse schools, worse hospitals, less social security, fewer universities with bigger class sizes and smaller subjects, lower or no minimum wage, lower taxes on the things they spend money on (i.e. big houses) and more taxes on the things the rest of us buy (food).

So you'd imagine, given the importance of this election, that the Labour Party would be united in desperation. Determined to pull together and put aside its differences in one last effort to save this country. You'd imagine wrongly. The only thing Labour any longer has in common with leftwing parties is its capacity to stab itself in the face. Today, failed Blairite non-entities Patricia Hewitt (great voting record, you koala-bothering git) and Geoff 'Buff' Hoon (aka Whoon, identical rightwing voting record) have stirred the pot by calling for a ballot of Labour MPs on the leadership.

I'm all for a new leader. A loud, dynamic, lefty. McDonnell, Skinner, Bob Marshall-Andrews, whoever. But not now. There are reasons to vote Labour (still). What undecided voter, however, will be attracted by yet more internecine warfare? The Tories don't do it like this. They're ruthless and decisive. They assassinate their leaders in the middle of the night. Labour prefers to act like an extended family opening up old feuds at a wedding reception - and for the last few years, it's been embittered Blairites like Charles Clarke, hooked on publicity and divorced from reality. The reality is that the Tories don't care about the working and lower-middle classes as anything other than voting fodder. Hewitt and Hoon have just done their bit to make the Rise of the Torymen inevitable.

Don't be evil. Don't vote Tory.

(Here's John McDonnell's reaction to a previous bit of New Labour spinning):


This is about the fourth or fifth, (I lost count some time ago), attempt by former New Labour apparatchiks to try and reinvent themselves. We have had former Blair/Brown insider advisers Neal Lawson and Jon Cruddas with Compass, Charles Clarke and Alan Milburn with 2020 Vision, and now James Purnell and Jon Cruddas with Demos's Open Left.

No matter how clever the project's title, how well its re-launch statements are drafted and how smart its website, none of them can escape from the objective history of the part they played in creating and supporting the reactionary, political deviation that was New Labour, a political project that has brought the Labour party to the edge of extinction.

Between them all they have either been the architects of, the advisers to, the parliamentary lobby fodder in support of or the ministerial implementers of policies which have left at least half a million innocent people dead in Iraq, doubled the number of homeless families in Britain, privatised more public sector jobs than Thatcher and Major put together, undermined long-cherished basic civil liberties and forced through so brutal an attack on the recipients of welfare benefits that even the Thatcher government refused to implement.

Quoting past Labour party theoreticians, intellectualising justifications for betrayal in the language of an A-level sociology paper, and speaking left while voting right will not wash off the blood of the murdered Iraqis or stem the tears of a single parent forced off benefits or help explain to the unemployed person how they can live on £65-a-week jobseeker's allowance.

Some among this crew realised sooner than others that the only hope for their future political careers was to jump ship from New Labour and to rebrand themselves on the left. They have been assisted by parts of the media that are implicated in delivering the Labour party and the country up to Blair, Brown and Mandelson, and who are also trying to distance themselves from the creature they helped create.

8 comments:

Ewarwoowar said...

Agree with all of that. Shame really, because I had started to think that Cameron had dropped the ball and Brown was gaining on him. And now all this nonsense.

Thanks for reminding me about Hayek and Friedman, memories of those halcyon A-Level politics days. How I miss them.

Adam said...

I completely disagree, and the line you're taking makes no sense; you seem to be saying: "I don't like Gordon Brown and the direction the Labour party has taken for the last twenty years, but I will still vote Labour because I hate the Tories."

Personally, I despise Gordon Brown. I also despise Tony Blair. I won't vote for the party responsible for Iraq and the continuing Afghan saga. Simple as that.

If you hate the Tories, vote for another party that more closely fits your views.

Then I suppose you'll suggest that a vote for any party other than Lab-Con is a wasted vote. Ordinarily perhaps, but not this time. The Labour party have to lose I'm afraid, or they ain't going to change. Blindly voting Labour even though you can't stand their policies or their leaders is just bonkers.

Oh, and Skinner for PM? Come on.

As for the so-called putsch, it was just a stunt. It's well known Mandelson has lost influence in recent months and he's p*ssed off with Gordon (http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jan/05/peter-mandelson-gordon-brown-tensions). Mandelson came back to government to haul Gordon's ass out of the fire and has staved off several rebellions by appealing to the Blairites for calm. So this latest stunt is just a sham - but what better way to remind Gordon who's the boss, and secure some influence?

The Plashing Vole said...

Adam, I respect Dennis Skinner, but I was joking. If you oppose the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, you can't vote Tory.

Under the current electoral system, the only choices in my constituency are the Labour and Conservative parties, so I shall vote for the least worst, which is Labour (I would otherwise vote Green or CP). In spite of everything, they aren't as evil as the Tories. I do want Labour to change, but I don't want the Tories dismantling the state in the meantime.

I'd settle for a Labour/Lib Dem/Plaid coalition, but my vote here won't make any difference to that.

Adam said...

Fair enough.

I'm not tribal when it comes to politics, as they will all disappoint you in the end. It's all very well taking sides as if it's a football team and supporting them through thick and thin, but if I fundamentally disagree with the policies, I look elsewhere and look at the policies and the track record of whatever else is out there.

It's very difficult to choose a party at the moment. I liked Blair at first, but the corruption and the war-mongering, and the cosying up to Bush got too much for me. I thought Brown would be a good PM, but then his personality issues have blighted any good he may have done. He and Balls are bullies, by all accounts, and I can't stand bullies.

I don't buy the "same old Tories" line - saying the Tories will cut back the public sector to the bare bones because Thatcher did is like saying Labour would re-nationalise the railways and utilities (and we both know that will never happen). And what about the Labour cuts to higher ed they announced before xmas? More of that to come methinks. However the Tories are untested, an unknown quantity. They will definitely cut; but so will Labour.

Unfortunately, this country's political system is broken. I think we need PR (a simple form of PR, not the hokey complicated and abstruse forms that will just confuse and disenfranchise people); but then I also think we need democracy establishing in this country. Will never happen unfortunately.

Kate said...

Hmmmm! Agree with most of what has been said here, but not all. Firstly John McDonnell is definitely my hero of the week; such an eloquent, accurate and cutting indictment of New Labour, how cathartic! Secondly Adam, I also find it difficult to understand how Voley can bring himself to vote Labour, but equally, where is the party we can vote for that is credible and that people genuinely believe will make a difference/improve society - there isn't one as far as I can see. I'll probabably vote Lib Dem, one for similar reasons to Vole (I'm in Essex and they're the only party that have any chance of keeping a seat from the Tories, though it's a very slim chance) and also because like you I really want PR/moves towards genuine democracy. Thirdly, Adam - you think the 'same old tories' argument is lazy, maybe it is, but have you actively looked into any of their current policies? They plan to repeal the Human Rights Act in Britain and write one of their own (anyone smell something fishy here?), repatriate social and employment legislation from the EU to the UK (now the EU may be a contraversial issue for us Brits but do think it would be beneficial for society to return to no minimum wage and no regulation over individuals working no more than 60 hours per week?)and move towards 'Easyjet' style 'no frills' local government; look at what Tory flagship Council Barnet is currently doing, cutting services left, right and centre meaning vulnerable members of society (e.g. the disabled and elderly)are far worse off. Same old Tories? Well given their CURRENT POLICIES they undoubtedly are! I don't buy the argument that they are untested and an unknown quantity, given careful consideration of current evidence.

The Plashing Vole said...

Adam: I agree with almost everything you say. I'm also a big fan of a clear PR system as long as constituency links aren't broken. But I still feel that voting to keep the Tories out is an acceptable strategy.

Labour has disappointed me because they're meant to be the party of the workers, the poor, the downtrodden, of civil liberties and rights, and they've abandoned all of these things.

I respect the Tories more because (until now) they were openly and nakedly evil. They despise the poor and the proletariat and their message was 'do what you can to get yourself out and we'll reward your selfishness'. BUT: that doesn't mean that they deserve my vote. Cameron's cuddly conservatism has disappeared from his speeches in the last year. He's convinced he's going to win because everybody hates GB, so he's being honest about his harsh Thatcherite agenda (summarised brilliantly by Kate).

One more thing: large chunks of the railways have been nationalised again. Not very willingly, but it's happened. We've got nationalised banks too! It's the 1945 manifesto, finally fulfilled!

Kate said...

Agree totally Vole. At least Thatcher was honest about shafting you, unlike B-liar. And yes, I wanted to make the 'but some of the railways HAVE been renationalised!' point too but thought 'poor Adam!' and felt maybe I'd already been argumentative enough! (What? Me?!) ;-)

Adam said...

Something tells me that the "renationalisation" is only a temporary measure, but I'll let you have that one.