Occasionally I feel like a proper teacher - today was one of those days. Although there were the usual ones who didn't say a word or hadn't read the book (Sage's Bad Blood - read the first chapter here), we had a really interesting and enjoyable discussion in which I learned some things and gained perspectives which hadn't occurred to me, and I think I added something to their understanding. We talked for most of the 2 hours allotted without it feeling like any more than an hour to me, which is a really good sign.
Even better, some of them spontaneously started talking about how much they're enjoying next week's text (Niall Griffiths' wonderful Wreckage): one said she was almost late for today's class because she didn't want to stop reading. Whether next week's seminar is good or not, I think that's a sign that I'm getting something right. Mind you, the student who complained about naughty words in Freshers and Beauty hasn't bought a copy yet. I think I can safely say that Wreckage's dialogue makes Trainspotting look like the minutes of a League Against Swearing meeting.
Showing posts with label freshers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freshers. Show all posts
Wednesday, 30 March 2011
Monday, 7 February 2011
On niceness
I don't like the word nice. In its original sense (neat), it's OK, but now it means a kind of shallow politeness or surface attractiveness. It's pretty dismissive.
However, it came to mind when I received a student complaint today. It's about Joanna Davies's Freshers (originally published as Ffreshars). The essence of the complaint is that books shouldn't be published if they contain swearing and immoral activity, particularly if it's set in Wales. (Oddly, the author seems to agree: the English version has 20,000 words extra, which she describes as adding the 'sauce').
Now, Matthew Arnold, critic and moralist, described culture as the 'best that is thought and known', and saw access to art as the solution to the bestiality of the underclass (he also thought the aristocracy was a degenerate flock of wastrels). But that was in the 19th Century.
So what do you think? Should I only be teaching 'nice' fiction that informs and uplifts the degenerate masses? What would that curriculum look like? Anne of Green Gables is out: the Pye family are horrible and there's a world war in the later books. Guns turn up in Blyton's Adventure series. Biggles is an appallingly violent man. William would earn as ASBO these days, as would Dennis the Menace. The Box of Delights features a scrounging machine for turning children into dogmeat, and it depicts the clergy in a very unflattering light. Come to think of it, all the good children's literature is deeply subversive (as Alison Lurie demonstrates).
What's left? Your suggestions please.
Meanwhile, if you prefer your Welsh literature with heroin, violence, resentment and crime, I refer you to the works of Niall Griffiths, especially Sheepshagger. It's an astonishingly brilliant piece of writing.
Oh yes: another thing occurred to me. If she doesn't like unpleasantness in literature, how does she cope in a world where governments torture and unspeakably evil acts go on every day? In particular, let's remind ourselves of the traditional Welsh medieval punishment, picked up from the Normans: gouging out each others' eyes, by hand.
However, it came to mind when I received a student complaint today. It's about Joanna Davies's Freshers (originally published as Ffreshars). The essence of the complaint is that books shouldn't be published if they contain swearing and immoral activity, particularly if it's set in Wales. (Oddly, the author seems to agree: the English version has 20,000 words extra, which she describes as adding the 'sauce').
Now, Matthew Arnold, critic and moralist, described culture as the 'best that is thought and known', and saw access to art as the solution to the bestiality of the underclass (he also thought the aristocracy was a degenerate flock of wastrels). But that was in the 19th Century.
So what do you think? Should I only be teaching 'nice' fiction that informs and uplifts the degenerate masses? What would that curriculum look like? Anne of Green Gables is out: the Pye family are horrible and there's a world war in the later books. Guns turn up in Blyton's Adventure series. Biggles is an appallingly violent man. William would earn as ASBO these days, as would Dennis the Menace. The Box of Delights features a scrounging machine for turning children into dogmeat, and it depicts the clergy in a very unflattering light. Come to think of it, all the good children's literature is deeply subversive (as Alison Lurie demonstrates).
What's left? Your suggestions please.
Meanwhile, if you prefer your Welsh literature with heroin, violence, resentment and crime, I refer you to the works of Niall Griffiths, especially Sheepshagger. It's an astonishingly brilliant piece of writing.
Oh yes: another thing occurred to me. If she doesn't like unpleasantness in literature, how does she cope in a world where governments torture and unspeakably evil acts go on every day? In particular, let's remind ourselves of the traditional Welsh medieval punishment, picked up from the Normans: gouging out each others' eyes, by hand.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)