We're using large classrooms but allowing only a few students in at any one time. They're widely spaced behind single desks - there's no seminar format, only serried ranks facing a lecturer who is forbidden to move around. Whether it stops us getting infected remains to be seen, but it's certainly retarding any progressive pedagogical practise. It's interesting seeing the way the students tailor the online experience too. Virtually none want to turn on their cameras, which is fine by me, though I will award extra credit for cats (demerits for any dogs polluting my stream). I wish I didn't have to appear on camera either: there's nothing more distracting than seeing a student being physically sick). Some are happy to talk, most aren't: use of the chat function is far more common. The lack of facial expressions and other cues makes it very difficult to have a conversation or general discussion.
The pleasures are those of every new academic year: fresh faces and new ideas. The pains are the obvious psychological and emotional wounds caused by months of deprivation - of fresh air, of company, of debate and stimulus. Oh, and the awful, awful IT experience: I haven't yet managed to get Panopto (the lecture streaming/recording system named by ironic scumbags) to live-stream anything or record a whole live lecture. Today it broadcast slides for a lecture I gave the previous day, then cut off anyway after 20 minutes. I have a badge which reads 'Ed-Tech Will Not Save You' (courtesy of @DrDonnaLanclos).
It's tempting to get a new one: 'Not Only Will Ed-Tech Not Save You, It Will Push You In'. The HEI ecosphere is packed with salesmen flogging shiny applications that promise managers an end to the misery of employing actual human beings, owning buildings and books and equipment, or doing things that can't be made, done and assessed algorithmically. The pandemic has been like a lottery win for these people, as desperate decision-makers shell out the readies for anything that promises a zipless education without any human contact. They largely don't work for anything beyond the monologue that I thought we'd largely abandoned, at least in the humanities. When they do work, they promote a linear and uncritical model of pedagogy that literally isn't worth having. The Open University knows how to do it properly - everyone else wants to do it quickly and cheaply. Having gutted my curriculum to make space for the hours-hungry new model, I tried to get management to admit that the students would have a worse education than under normal conditions: they wouldn't do it, which I thought was shameful.
Not sure much of this rambling makes much sense, but then again, I'm not hearing much sense from many quarters, including the government. I've lost track of what our extra local restrictions mean, and long stopped understanding why I can meet a few friends in the pub but the same friends couldn't sit in my garden, for instance. Personally, the lockdown has been mixed. I've gone from being in the office for ten hours a day every day of the week to popping in for a couple of hours to teach. I miss my friends/colleagues (largely the same group) and of course seeing friends and family elsewhere, but I've lost a ton of weight through getting out on the bike every day and not living on colleagues' baked goods, but I miss chatting with students and colleagues over tea. I miss the random conversations, the thousands of books I have at work, unexpected breaks and solidarity. I've had to install home internet, but I also installed a new kitchen. I've given up on Radio 4 for ever, while Radio 3 has become my happy place despite the vandalism of Late Junction's abolition. I've been for badger-spotting walks, but I miss gigs and concerts. The radical narrowing of my horizons has led to a reduction in opinions. Or rather I still have a lot of opinions but on few subjects: I bore myself, which is why I've largely replaced blogging with photos.
Ah well, this too shall pass.
1 comment:
I'm having a very untypical first term, inasmuch as I'm sitting at home not d- ahem- preparing teaching for next term. (The light teaching load is partly because of some research funding that should materialise any day now, and mainly because I'm currently on a 0.5 - which has costs but definitely has its benefits, even this year.)
I haven't had a good experience with, or heard good things about, any streaming technology except Zoom. (I also haven't heard of any HEI standardising on Zoom.) My own employer is pressing ahead with the wizard wheeze of allowing as much course delivery to go online as people want (up to 100%), while also insisting on two hours of face to face delivery per week. (Face to face delivery of what, you ask, as indeed did we. Well, that's up to individual departments. Flexibility!) This plan was drawn up in July, when the local infection rate was 10 per 100,000 per week; it's now 230, the sixth highest in the country. Also, the university has recently (physically) locked down most of its Foundation and first years, so we'll leave them out of it for now. As I say, there are advantages to being part-time.
As for ed tech and the vultures, I'm not so sure about the Open University either, it pains me to say. I've recently started a "taking your teaching online" open.edu module, which currently seems to be pushing me towards designing Reusable Learning Objects. RLOs appear to be a bit like Powerpoints with recorded narration, only (a) five minutes long (b) devoted to a single proposition and, very importantly, (c) ending with a quiz where you can tell them if they've got it yet. I like the idea of students thinking about things; I'm less keen on the idea of making students think about things; and I'm positively opposed to the idea of telling students they've got things wrong (at five-minute intervals). Somebody tells me Nigel Farage is a left-winger, I want to know why they think that - I'm not in the business of saying "No, that's incorrect. Try again! (You may want to look again at the 'political spectrum' on slide 2!)". (At least, I didn't think I was.)
Post a Comment