So Louis Vuitton sued her.
Now she's used the image again, and they're suing her for unlimited damages again, despite the image's status as art ('fair use') and non-profit.
Could it be that they're embarrassed by the juxtaposition of enormous and self-indulgent wealth with real suffering, and want to silence anyone who makes the connection? I think it could…
What can you do? Well, do as I do: boycott Vuitton goods (not, I admit, a difficult struggle) and send the Red Cross some money.
