Friday 17 July 2009

Does cricket have an image problem?


Or, does English cricket have an image problem. A prize if you can spot anyone young, black, female or poor-to-middling in this wonderful slideshow, from which I've nicked this image. Gotta love those trousers.

12 comments:

  1. That huge bloke in photo 9. Got to be a cockney wideboy who's just blagged his way in.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The Guardian have done well today, I've just read today's proceedings in their live blog, I haven't missed a thing thankfully.

    These pictures are indeed excellent and the Cockney that Merciless referred to is actually Ray Winstone's Dad.

    ReplyDelete
  3. At the risk of being merked here...really?

    It's feasible I suppose that that bloke could be Winstone's father but...is cricket popular in East Ham. If Demented is right cor blimey. If I've been royally merked I'll hide for a month.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Found a good hiding place, Merciless?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Time to set up a splinter blog under a fake name, I feel. I can finally do that blog about cheeses I've always wanted to. Look out for Brie Encounter people.

    ReplyDelete
  6. 'Merked'? I love 'Brie Encounter', merciless. Genius.

    ReplyDelete
  7. It's like "owned" or "pwned", Voley.

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=merked

    With his Winstone joke, Demon royally merked Merciless.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Demented- 1, Merciless- 0. Fabulous merked volley from the edge of the laptop.

    Vole, Merked means deceiving. Rio Ferdinand coined the term, I believe with his ITV show in 2006 I think it was. Whereby, Peter Crouch for instance would be royally embarrassed by say, a rude waiter.

    Sadly, no footballers were harmed in the making of the less than successful show. Just imagine how popular it would have been if say, John Terry was run over by a JCB...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Ah, thank you. I'm familiar with 'pwned' and felt pretty cool. Clearly I now hang my head.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Forcing photographers to include a representative from each sex, race and age group in every photograph they published would be farcical and ridiculous. As would be forcing a representative from each group to enjoy cricket - different groups enjoy different activities, it is a fact of life!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ooh, stressy. I'd be more impressed if you'd dared leave your name, Anonymous. Actually, this was a light-hearted comment. Strange you should think it's the photographer's fault. This is the MCC members' entrance: I believe it was men only until very recently, which is discriminatory. Did I suggest 'forcing' other people to like cricket? I don't think so. I merely think that some sports are losing fans and potential competitors through not welcoming people from all walks of life. Cricket (though not the MCC in particular) is addressing this: my sport (fencing) isn't.

    ReplyDelete

Send me your reckons: